Filed In: MAC

MAC de-potting project … or how I finally organized my eyeshadow singles

MAC de-potting project opener

 

I hadn’t realized how many MAC single eyeshadows I owned, until one day they threatened to overflow the container I kept them in. So what did I do? I divided them up into colour groups of 15 shadows (the size of the large MAC palettes), and placed them in baggies to await their new home. And wait, they did. And wait some more.

It came to the point where I didn’t even know what colours I had anymore, and decided to “de-pot” them all; it helped that MAC dropped the price of their palettes (CAD $10.00) and inserts (CAD $2.00), which made this project so much easier on the wallet. Having never attempted this before, I scoured Youtube videos for how-to methods, and found one that worked for me (I don’t remember which video it was now … sorry!)

*Note that some of the photos are grainy and/or a touch blurry – they were taken in a rush with my phone.

The mission:

To de-pot +/- 65 single eyeshadows into 5 palettes

Prep:

  • paper towels
  • small sharp knife
  • letter opener
  • tweezers
  • heat source (tea light candle)
  • pen & paper
  • 2-sided tape
  • transparent 1″ round stickers
  • Sharpie (I used red ultra-fine; white, silver or gold would be even better)
  • eyeshadows in their pots (like, duh)

Directions:

  1. After laying down some paper towels on your work surface, begin by inserting the tip of your small sharp knife into the seam found on the eyeshadow pot (fig. 1) and add some pressure by twisting the knife slightly until the eyeshadow in its plastic “sleeve” pops out of the larger container (fig. 2). Remember to keep the knife pointed away from you.
  2. With the tweezers, firmly grip one edge of the eyeshadow (fig. 3) and place it over your candle, staying approximately 2-3 inches above the heat source. Remember that the purpose is for the bottom of the plastic to soften/melt enough, so that you can pop the eyeshadow out of its plastic “sleeve” – that being said, be aware that IT WILL GET VERY HOT. Turn it over often to check the progress – the entire process takes less than a minute.
  3. Once underside of the plastic pot has melted sufficiently (fig. 4), turn the shadow over and still gripping one edge firmly with the tweezers, use the blunted tip of a letter opener to push the shadow out of the plastic sleeve (fig. 5). The glue used to stick the shadow to the plastic pot will have melted and may be stringy – try to avoid it (fig. 6).  DO NOT TOUCH ANYTHING WITH YOUR FINGERS AT THIS POINT as the metal will still be very hot.
  4. Keeping the popped eyeshadow upside down on the paper towel, take the original plastic pot & gripping it by the edge of the lid (fig. 7), hold it over the flame once more (slightly higher and moving it around to avoid the paper label from scorching) for about 7-10 seconds, until an edge of the label lifts enough that you can peel it off easily with the tweezers (fig. 8).
  5. Working quickly, place the freshly peeled label onto the back surface of your popped eyeshadow and press into place (fig. 9).
  6. Before inserting your newly prepared eyeshadows in the palette, make sure to write down their names (and type ie: matte, frost, etc) and placement order on a piece of paper – necessary for the last step.
  7. Attach small slivers of 2-sided tape to each eyeshadow label (being careful to avoid placing the tape on the name) and pop each prepared eyeshadow into its place in the palette. With your finger covered by a tissue, add some light pressure onto the eyeshadow’s surface to ensure it adhered well.
  8. With a Sharpie, clearly list each eyeshadow on the transparent stickers (fig. 10), then using your previous written information as a guide, place these new labels on the underside of the palette, in the same order as the shadows appear within the palette (fig. 11).

Helpful tips:

Dividing your eye shadows into the colour groups of your choice BEFORE you begin a project such as this, makes it easier once you begin; this way you know exactly what will go where, with no unnecessary scrambling during the process.

By taking a few extra minutes to write down the eyeshadow names (and the order that they’ll be in their respective palettes), you eliminate the guesswork of what shade you’re dealing with.

Even though these palettes are said to have a magnetic base, I found that the de-potted eyeshadows did NOT stick in their individual slots at all. You can always buy a roll of magnetic tape to affix pieces to each eyeshadow, but that might add bulk; 2-sided tape is much sleeker to work with, and sticks like a charm.


MAC de-potting project shadow pots

the ‘Before’ shot: MAC single eyeshadows living in baggies


MAC shadows

splitting up the eyeshadows into their final colour groups (missing one baggie-full here)


MAC de-potting project empty palettes

a view of the insert (left) and the clear-topped palette


MAC de-potting project palette insert

a closer look at the insert


MAC de-potting project start

fig. 1: first stage in separating the plastic pot


MAC de-potting project shadow removed

fig.  2: eyeshadow in its plastic “sleeve” out of the pot


MAC de-potting project

fig. 3: holding the eyeshadow over the heat source


MAC de-potting project 2

fig. 4: bottom of plastic “sleeve” ready to have its eyeshadow popped out


MAC de-potting project 3

fig. 5: pushing the eyeshadow out of its “sleeve”


MAC de-potting project 4

fig. 6: glue strings


MAC de-potting project heating label

fig. 7: heating the label


MAC de-potting project peeling label

fig. 8: peeling the label


MAC de-potting project label applied

fig. 9: peeled label attached to de-potted eyeshadow


MAC de-potting project 5

fig. 10: writing down each eyeshadow name on transparent stickers


MAC de-potting project palette labels

fig. 11: transparent labels affixed to the back of each palette


MAC de-potting project completed

the completed results!


MAC de-potting project 6 palettes

the bottom right palette was created a few years ago – note the older style

*Click to enlarge each palette photo to view the names clearer


MAC Palette 1 cool shades

Palette 1: Cool Shades


MAC Palette 2 pinks & purples

Palette 2: Pinks & Purples


MAC Palette 3 warm shades

Palette 3: Warm Shades


MAC Palette 4 oceanic shades

Palette 4: Greens & Blues


MAC Palette 5 jewel warm smokey

Palette 5: Warm Smokey


MAC Palette 6 neutrals & staples

Palette 6: (Original) Neutrals & Staples

 

The only eyeshadows I didn’t de-pot, were the ones that came in limited edition packaging – I didn’t have the heart to ruin those (about 30 more, actually). Each of the 5 new palettes that I put together holds several limited edition shades as well, in case you’re wondering why some of the names aren’t familiar – but as their containers were the regular black kind, I had no qualms taking them apart.

Moral of the story: not only was this project fun to do, but totally cathartic as well to an organizing freak such as myself. The best part? I’m now actually USING my eyeshadows, as opposed to neglecting them. The slim lines of each palette makes them very portable and easily stacked, while the clear transparent lid means I can now see what each palette holds without needing to open it up first. Another unexpected bonus of this project, is being able to take advantage of the “Back to MAC” program so much quicker, where for every six MAC containers you bring back to the store, you can then exchange them for new products (the MAC store nearest me offers a choice of either a lipstick or eyeshadow) – I brought back enough empty pots to pick up about 10 new eyeshadows – which helped to complete my palettes. See? Nothing but benefits all around.

One warning, however: this type of project yields immediate results and becomes kind of, well, addictive. I’m thinking of attacking my blushes next …


MAC de-potting closer

Buy cheap fucidin online
Buy cheap lasix online
Buy cheap ventolin inhaler online

The ommorphia Beauty Vault: Highlighters – creams, powders & hybrids

Highlighters - opener

 

When I began the process of inventorying & sorting my cosmetics collection, I assumed the highlighter category would be a relatively short write-up, but a quick scroll through the photos in this post, clearly shows how wrong that thinking was. Indulging and using highlighters is a rather new fascination for me, and I’ve come to rely on a well-placed dab of this product to add that little extra something to my finished look. Like emphasizing the killer cheekbones I wish I was born with. If only.

While many of the products shown in this post are no longer available, you can use the information provided as a general guide for your future highlighter purchases.


Highlighters - creams

The Creams (and one liquid) – all by MAC, only Shell (far right) is part of the permanent range, as well as the most neutral of this group. The 3 shown here impart the most colour, as far as highlighters go, as well as the highest level of shimmer/sparkle. Easiest format for blending, the warmth of your fingers helps these creams glide seamlessly along the skin – with the liquid applying in an even more effortless manner.


Highlighters - Creams 2

Bearing less pigmentation than the above cream highlighters, the 2 shown here share a similar nude base, although their application and final look is completely unique.


Highlighters - creams swatches

The breakdown:

  • NARS Copacabana Multiple – the only one in stick format, coolest leaning and more silvery with apparent ultra-fine shimmer
  • Illamasqua Gleam in Aurora (reviewed here) – the creamiest & sheerest of them all, champagne toned, most subtle gleam
  • MAC Shell Cream Colour Base – drier texture, pale silvery-pink iridescence
  • MAC Playmate Pink Glitter Cream (2003 MAC for Playboy Collection) – driest texture, deeper pink hue with visible large golden sparkle
  • MAC Sun Rush Lustre Drops (2010 To the Beach Collection) – highest gleam but easiest to blend, a deep golden/copper tone


Highlighters - pink powders

The Powders (pink hued) – what binds the three of this group together, is that they all share varying levels of pink in their base, which serves to bring a fresh & youthful flush to the skin.


Highlighters - pink powders swatch

The breakdown:

  • Laura Mercier Rose Rendezvous (reviewed here) – the deepest pigmentation and shine factor, ultra-finely milled powder, most coppery
  • Guerlain Cruel Gardenia (reviewed here) – the softest powder with more of a rose-gold tone, sophisticated gleam
  • Guerlain Perles du Paradis (full review forthcoming) – palest, sheerest and slightly pink-tinged, superior blending capacity


Highlighters - neutral powders

The Powders (neutral/gold hued) – with some light tan hints in this grouping, along with a few gilded touches, these all share a more easily wearable gleam.


Highlighters - neutral powders swatch

The breakdown:

  • CHANEL Poudre Lumière Sculptée (2011 Holiday Collection, reviewed here) – the palest toned, most subtle glow, slightly powdery
  • CHANEL Lumière d’Artifices Beiges (2012 Fall Collection, reviewed here) – most flesh toned, finely milled, subtle shimmery glow
  • MAC By Candelight Mineralize Skinfinish (2009 Warm & Cozy Collection) – most visible shimmer, drier texture, hints of rose
  • Giorgio Armani Madreperla Face Palette (2011 Holiday Collection, reviewed here) – most golden, dry but ultra-fine texture


Chanel Illuminating Powder

Poudre Signée de Chanel Illuminating Powder (Spring 2013 Collection) has just recently joined my collection, so it hasn’t been fully reviewed yet, but from initial wearing, it imparts an absolutely amazing glow to the skin, exceptionally fine-milled and with subtle golden hints – no visible sparkle. Full review to follow.


Highlighter-Blush hybrids

The Highlighter/Blush Hybrids – some products seem to straddle the line between purposes; looking like blush but with definitive highlighter overtones, these impart both colour and a gleam – you just need to use a lighter hand in application.

Note that the two decorative MAC products shown were not swatched; I still haven’t been able to bring myself to use them (apart from a tiny touch on one of the palettes) – sounds crazy, but there you have it.


Highlighter-Blush hybrids swatch

The breakdown:

  • NARS Orgasm Multiple – creamy finish, most easily blended, peach toned
  • MAC Stereo Rose Mineralize Skinfinish – subtle shimmer, fine-milled, rose-gold overall tone
  • MAC Marine Life High-Light Powder (2010 To The Beach Collection) – most intense pigmentation, gold only an overspray
  • MAC My Paradise Cheek Powder (2011 Surf, Baby! Collection) – most coral hued with a light golden layer (mainly overspray)


Highlighters - face powders

The Face Powders – I’ve included these 4 powders in this category, primarily because they each bear too much colour to be used as true face powders of the type meant to invisibly set your look – but rather impart a lightly diffused tone to the skin when applied, more sheen than shimmer.


Highlighters - face powders swatch

The breakdown:

  • CHANEL Rose Merveille Poudre Universelle (2011 Spring Collection) – most visible shimmer of the group, but still quite subdued
  • Shu Uemura Luring Powder in Rose (2008 Fall Collection) – deepest tone, some powdery kickback, softest texture of all reviewed
  • MAC Tahitian Sand Beauty Powder (2009 Hello Kitty Collection) – most neutral toned, drier texture
  • MAC Alpha Girl Beauty Powder (2008 Heatherette Collection) – pink tinged and cool leaning, drier texture

 

Final thoughts: When I purchased MAC’s Playmate Pink Glitter Cream (from the Playboy Collection) back in 2003, I had absolutely no idea how to use it properly, and so it’s lain languishing in an obscure corner, almost forgotten until I began preparing for this post. My next “real” highlighter was the Copacabana Multiple from NARS, mainly because I had heard/read so many makeup artists raving about it and therefore I added that to my makeup collection as well.

Fast forward a few years later, and while I’m amazed at how many highlighters I presently own, I’ve also realized how much I have come to rely on them, from layering under foundation to provide a luminous “lit-from-within” kind of glow – a great way to wear this product during the day, to adding drama to my upper cheekbones for deeper impact on an evening look, or an overall lightly diffused sheen to provide radiance. And thus, the addiction to highlighters is born …


Highlighters - closer

 

 

 

*Disclosure: Some products provided by the company/PR for my unbiased consideration

Laura Mercier ‘Rose Rendezvous’ Face Illuminator Moonlight Collection Holiday 2011 (swatches, comparison & review)

 

When I first heard of this collection and saw the early promotional photos, I quickly dismissed this illuminator as something I would rarely, if ever use. Then the whispers began about how amazing it was; I heard them, but still wasn’t convinced. But as they say, when something is meant to be, it will be so a few days later while shopping at Holt Renfrew (Montréal), I strolled by the Laura Mercier counter to ask about ‘Rose Rendezvous’. I was told that there was one left (basically in the entire country), but that it was “on hold” for another customer.  Leaving my name & number with the sales agent in the unlikely event said customer might miraculously change her mind, I left with a heavy heart dramatic sigh. Later that afternoon, I got THE CALL: if I wanted it, it was mine! A true Christmas miracle, lol!  The rest, as they say, is history.

 

 

Holding the closed compact as though it were one of the ten commandment tablets, I gazed lovingly at its iconic brown surface, and realized that it was basically embedded with almost holographic-like particles…a harbinger of things to come, perhaps?

 

 

Carefully opening up the palette, I laid it on top of the box to admire it some more. This lasted for several seconds … or maybe even minutes … hours … lost track of time at this point …

 

 

‘Rose Rendezvous’ – even the name conjures up images of a lovely, yet somewhat virginal maiden about to enter into her first illicit tryst (obviously, I read WAY too many romance novels in my youth!), is a visually stunning assault on your eyes. The very first thing you notice, is the incredibly detailed raised rose pattern of the palette itself. Then you become transfixed by its gleaming rolex pink gold and coppery hue. How on earth could I possibly bring myself to actually mar this beauty’s surface? But after taking a million photos, I dove in.  The powder, while looking almost scarily sparkly, turned out to be incredibly smooth; so finely milled that it felt like ground velvet to the touch, it applied with an almost dream-like consistency.  I’m serious.  Easily buildable, a single swipe gives whispery gleaming touches where applied.  For a more intense look or to be worn as an eyeshadow, it can be layered for a more dramatic appearance. What I absolutely love, is that unlike other highlighters which can either lean towards gold or silver, this one is actually almost more natural looking as a result of its copper/pink undertones and will therefore add glowing touches of warmth to compliment its highlighting capacity. It must also be noted that I experienced absolutely no fallout with ‘Rose Rendezvous’ and it lasted well over eight hours with very little fading; it actually almost seemed to become even more luminous as my skin’s natural oils rose to the surface.

 

 

Seen in various lighting conditions, you can appreciate all of its nuances, from the most subtle shimmer to the highest gleam.

 

 

… this is love …

 

 

Looking at the above closeup, you can actually see how finely milled the powder is – no separation visible – and the most subtle gleaming particles that account for that incredible glow.

 

 

From this angle, you can see that the raised pattern adds the most stunning 3-dimensional effect to what is already an item of surpassing beauty.

 

 

I’ve included this photo, taken without flash, as I love how it showcases the distinction of the roses against the illuminator’s background.

 

 

The above swatch taken in natural light (applied heavily on the left, blended lightly on the right), gives you a clear indication of how well ‘Rose Rendezvous’ works on the skin, without ever coming across as too much.

 

 

The same swatches, but seen here with flash to emphasize the gleam factor, displays that under a focused light, this product still manages to work so beautifully on the skin.

 

 

Naturally, I needed to compare ‘Rose Rendezvous’ to two other highlighters in my collection, MAC’s ‘Stereo Rose’ (right), as well as CHANEL’s ‘Lumière Sculptée’ (top, previously reviewed here).

 

 

In the above photo taken in natural light, and for the most part swatched with a heavy hand for comparison purposes (‘Stereo Rose’ on the left, ‘Rose Rendezvous’ middle two {heavy,blended}, and ‘Lumière Sculptée’ on the far right), you immediately notice how white the CHANEL appears beside the other two, and while the MAC is very close in tone, it still seems a touch more coral leaning with a completely different look in its composition. From the three, The MAC had the grittiest feel to it, while the CHANEL was the most powdery (somewhat chalky in comparison), but ‘Rose Rendezvous’ was “just right”, as the fairy tale states!

 

 

The same swatch, but seen here with flash, clearly indicates the differing levels of shine provided by each, with the MAC coming off as a more subdued version of ‘Rose Rendezvous’, while the CHANEL imparts an understated subtle glow.

 

Final thoughts: I am so, so glad that I allowed myself to swayed by my two friends’ eloquent reviews on ‘Rose Rendezvous’, as this is not only a completely unique product in my beauty arsenal, but so amazingly easy to work with. If you’re not a fan of anything shiny, then walking away from something like this shouldn’t be a hardship, but if you’re like me (fairly new to using highlighters and deathly afraid of looking radioactive), and looking for that certain extra “something” that completes your makeup look, then ‘Rose Rendezvous’ is that perfect product that can give your face an artfully stunning illumination.  I understand that it’s been sold out on both Laura Mercier’s website as well as Sephora since it first launched, but perhaps a diligent search through stores that carry the range, might provide fruitful – it happened to me!

 

 

Gareth Pugh Collection for MAC ‘Hyper’ (swatches, comparisons & review)

 

MAC’s recent collaboration with hot young British designer Gareth Pugh, has resulted in a capsule collection consisting of several limited edition pieces, one of which I bring you today. ‘Hyper’, an intensely gleaming, ultra rich indigo nail varnish, instantly drew me…not only because of the colour itself, but for the vampy mystery it seemed to promise. Without bothering to swatch it at the store first, I basically bought it sight unseen and hoped for the best – and I’m so glad I did!  The following swatches are all with Deborah Lippmann’s 2-Second Nail Primer, and Essie’s All In One Base Coat, as well as No Chips Ahead Top Coat.

 

 

The above images from Gareth Pugh’s Spring/Summer 2012 collection, exemplify what this eclectic British designer has become known for: edgy, urban, minimalistic, and sophisticated futuristic chic.  I love how the “x” design on the bottle, as well as the geometric packaging, mimics and follows the lines of his designs … inspired!

 

 

The exterior of the box pays homage to Gareth Pugh’s love of the geometric shape, while giving it a twist by the use of a foil finish.  Above photo is from a 2007 Gareth Pugh collection … uncanny resemblance!

 

 

The top of the box with the almost camouflaged name sticker!

 

 

‘Hyper’, one of three limited edition nail varnishes released in this limited edition capsule collection, is the only one that really caught – and held – my eye.  Catching only tantalizing glimpses of the colour through the cut out shapes on the bottle, it totally seduced me with its deep rich blue tones that seemed to morph to a vivid violet before my eyes.  The bottle itself is not your usual MAC shape; a square, heavy-gauge glass bottle with a black “x” silkscreened on each of its four sides, the narrow cap also has the MAC logo embossed along its length.  The formula seems to be a departure from MAC’s norm, being a touch on the thick side and could be applied as a one-coater if so desired, although I prefer the look of at least two coats, myself.  The brush felt a bit short, but was still  manageable and while the purple duochrome clearly appears in the bottle, it was next to impossible to detect any such flash upon the nails – my only disappointment with this beauty.  On the other hand, the formula was wonderful in every other sense, being self-levelling, bearing a “secret shimmer”, finishing with a nice gloss and leaving behind absolutely no staining.

 

A sunlight photo, while not capturing any true duochrome flash, still hints at some cobalt influences as seen hovering around the nail edges.

 

This closeup angle is the only image where I was able to capture ‘Hyper’s’ most apparent violet leanings.

 

Indirect light does amazing things to the inner shimmer of this shade, and casts a midnight hybrid blue/deep purple hue to the nail tips.

 

A shaded/backlit view brings your eye towards the center shimmering core of ‘Hyper’, and adds a cobalt tint to the overall colour.

 

A final view taken with flash, while highlighting the jewel-like gleam of this lacquer, also gives a slight nod towards it violet secondary tones.

 

 

I hate it when I believe I’ve stumbled across something new & unique, bring it home, then get that nagging sense that I may have seen it before – naturally, that meant looking through my collection to see if I had anything close to ‘Hyper’. Imagine my surprise when I pulled out 3 possible candidates! Clockwise from the bottom left in the above photo, is Dior’s ‘Tuxedo’ (previously reviewed here), followed by Nicole by OPI’s ‘Listen to your Momager!’ from the recently released Kardashian Kolors Collection (previously reviewed here), and finally an oldie, but goodie, OPI’s ‘Yoga-Ta Get This Blue!’ from the 2008 India Collection.  All swatches are with two coats of lacquer, and here’s a quick breakdown of how they compared to ‘Hyper’:

 

  • Index finger – ‘Yoga-Ta Get This Blue’: holds the same density of shimmer as ‘Hyper’ and hints of that same purple flash, semi-sheer formula, the runniest in terms of viscosity but the glossiest natural finish.
  • Middle finger – ‘Hyper’
  • Ring finger – ‘Tuxedo’: a more navy base colour, deepest in tone that the others, with a similarly thick formula to ‘Hyper’, but the least glossy of them all.
  • Pinkie finger – ‘Listen to your Momager!’: sheerest in formula (could have definitely used a third coat to look more opaque), with a floppier brush, but in some lights looks the closest.

 

In sunlight, the OPI’s shimmer appears almost aqua next to ‘Hyper’s’ finer blue bits, with the pinkie looking closest in colour.

 

In indirect light, you catch slight hints of purple in both the OPI and ‘Hyper’, with the Dior’s obvious darker tone setting it far apart.

 

Shaded light emphasizes how much sparser the pinkie finger’s shimmer is next to the rest, while spotlighting the more vivid base hue of ‘Hyper’.

 

A final view taken with flash reveals a much closer shimmer between ‘Hyper’ and the Dior, but you can still detect slight differences with each.

 

Final thoughts: A while back, I had personally declared that this year shades of blue would undergo a renaissance of sorts, and I still stand by that statement – especially after wearing this gorgeous shade. I really do wish that the duochrome flash one is first introduced to from the bottle, actually translated more obviously once applied, but it doesn’t detract from the fact that this is a really luxurious and richly pigmented lacquer.  Is it a unique colour? The fact that I was able to pull out at least three comparison bottles says “no” – however, none of them actually had all the elements of ‘Hyper’. It’s a wonderful formula and non-staining: a total win for me. My only real complaint is that while regular MAC lacquers retail for CAD $18.00 for 10 ml/0.34 fl.oz, the Gareth Pugh lacquers are a much heftier CAD $27.00 for 9 ml/0.30 fl.oz. which explains why I only went for the one…!

 

 

 

 

*Disclaimer: some products provided by the company/PR for my unbiased consideration

*Image credits here and here

MAC Mischievous Mint and Little Girl Type – ‘Quite Cute Collection’ (swatches, review & comparison)

 

When MAC launched their ‘Quite Cute Collection’ this past Spring 2011, of the three nail lacquers included, I gravitated towards these two: ‘Mischievous Mint’ – a pale minty green, and ‘Little Girl Type’ – a milky light lavender. Something about these hues fully puts me in a regenerative Spring-like kind of mood….a nice change after a long and bleak Winter, and just perfect as we enter full Summer mode.  All swatches are with Sèche Natural base coat, two coats of lacquer and Sèche Vite top coat.

 

‘Mischievous Mint’ is a rather nostalgic-looking hue, reminiscent of the light green shade of 50’s era appliances.  This is a highly pigmented polish, a touch on the thick side but quite easy to apply just the same and bearing a good self-levelling formula. I’m not usually a fan of MAC nail polish brushes as I find their quality to be inconsistent, but I had no problems here.  A nice bonus was how quick drying and glossy the final finish looked.

 

I absolutely love this shade when seen in full sun, looking all cloudy, squishy and deliciously milky (I rhymed!), and I know it will be a wonderful counterpoint against lightly tanned skin.

 

While shaded light brings out its cooler side, it then seems to take on a more sophisticated look, but still maintains its somewhat “vintage” appeal.

 

‘Little Girl Type’, another milky pastel, is an interesting cross between ultra light lavender and the palest of pink hues.  Once more, the formula applied well, with zero brush strokes, smoothing out easily and finishing off with a high gloss shine, although dry time was slightly longer than I prefer.

 

When seen in full sun, ‘Little Girl Type’ looks more like a white with lilac tints in it, but there’s no mistaking that this is indeed a lovely and almost feminine pale lavender shade, which I find will be highly complimentary against many skin tones.

 

I love how shaded light deepens the tone and gives off a slight greyish tinge to the overall look, taking it from cute to chic…just like that!

 

The closest match I found to ‘Mischievous Mint’ was Essie’s ‘Mint Candy Apple’ which has a similar green hue.  The formula on the Essie was approximately the same as the MAC, although I much prefer its brush – hands down over MAC brushes – and both lacquers dried to a similar wonderful shine. Swatches below are index and ring fingers – ‘Mischievous Mint’, middle and pinkie fingers – ‘Mint Candy Apply’.

 

Seen in full sun, you can immediately see that ‘Mischievous Mint’ definitely leans more blue compared to ‘Mint Candy Apple’s’ slightly greener cast, although both bear that same creamy tone.

 

Even shaded light does not detract from the light variances in hue, although they do appear slightly more toned down.

 

I was fairly convinced that ‘Little Girl Type’ had a duplicate in Essie’s ‘Nice is Nice’ from the Spring 2011 collection (reviewed here), and it turns out I was right. They both have that cool toned but creamy lavender/pink hue and even the formula was basically similar, although once more the Essie brush made it that much easier to apply evenly versus the MAC brush.  All swatches below are with index and ring fingers – ‘Little Girl Type’, middle and pinkie fingers – ‘Nice is Nice’.

 

When seen in full sun, it’s almost impossible to tell them apart; you need to look very close to see the one tonal degree difference and even then, you may mistake it for a trick of the light.

 

Even when viewed in shaded light, they still appear to be identical, although I seem to feel that ‘Little Girl Type’ has a touch more purple/grey in its base, giving it a slightly cooler and more subdued look.

 

Final thoughts: While these shades are not unique, I was pleasantly surprised by how well they applied (especially for MAC) and how pretty they looked on. I also noted that the bottles need to be rolled between your palms well before applying, as there may be a tendency for the colour to separate. Obviously these shades have been done before (as noted here), although ‘Mischievous Mint’ is slightly different enough to be unique, as far as pale mint hues go. I must admit, that they are…quite cute!

 

 

 

*Disclaimer: some products sent by the company/PR for my unbiased consideration